Peter Thiel is completely fallacious about Alzheimer’s

The New York Instances ran a lengthy interview this morning between columnist Ross Douthat and enterprise capitalist and PayPal founder Peter Thiel. There is a cause it was printed within the opinion part.

Thiel, a Trump booster whose allies — together with Vice President JD Vance — now litter the White Home, was given free reign to debate quite a lot of subjects throughout over an hour of softball questions. Is Greta Thunberg the literal antichrist? Are the three predominant ideological faculties in Europe environmentalism, “Islamic Shariah legislation” and “Chinese language Communist totalitarian takeover”? Is AI “woke” and able to following Elon Musk to Mars? Peter appears to suppose so! Maybe the “simply asking questions” college of journalism may add “hey, what the fuck are you speaking about” to its repertoire.

Admittedly, many of those assertions fall squarely into the realm of issues that exist inside Thiel’s thoughts palace reasonably than verifiable info, with a minimum of one notable exception. Comparatively early of their chat, Peter tells Ross the next [emphasis ours]:

It is a fairly daring declare! It is also utterly unfaithful.

“There was no therapy 40 or 50 years in the past for Alzheimer’s illness,” Sterling Johnson, a professor of Geriatrics and Gerontology on the College of Wisconsin, Madison, instructed Engadget. “What we have been in a position to do within the final 20 years has been truly fairly extraordinary. We have developed markers that assist us determine when this illness begins, utilizing the utilizing amyloid markers and tau biomarkers, we all know that the illness truly begins 20 years earlier than the signs do, and that could be a essential factor to know if we’re going to stop this illness.”

In the meanwhile, Alzheimer’s stays incurable. However the absence of a miracle treatment doesn’t negate the accomplishments to this point in detection and prevention. “The primary remedies had been these window dressing remedies. It is like treating the signs such as you would deal with a chilly […] The primary era of amyloid remedy was that form of strategy the place it simply addressed the signs by amping up the neurons and rising the neurotransmitters obtainable to the to the mind cells.” Johnson, whose group runs one of many largest and longest studies on folks in danger for growing Alzheimer’s illnesses, added, “Now we’ve alternatives to truly modify the illness biology by the amyloid pathway, but additionally we’re targeted on the opposite proteinopathy — which is tau — and there is scientific trials underway.”

Thiel, a well known advocate for developments in radical life extension (together with a reported curiosity in injecting himself with the blood of younger folks) sees the state of scientific analysis on this space as sluggish and danger averse. However the groundbreaking work is occurring at this second. Professor Johnson pointed to a monoclonal antibody known as gantenerumab. In an early take a look at of 73 contributors with inherited mutations that might trigger them to overproduce amyloid within the mind, it lower the variety of contributors who developed Alzheimer’s signs virtually in half. “The massive section three prevention trials [of gantenerumab] are occurring proper now,”

For somebody who fashions himself as a heterodox thinker, Thiel definitely appears to have found a remarkably related speaking level to present Trump administration FDA head Robert F Kennedy Jr. “Alzheimer’s is a really, excellent instance of how [National Institute of Health] has gone off the rails over the previous 20 years in the past with analysis on amyloid plaques” Kennedy said at a Division of Well being budgetary listening to final month. He claimed the NIH was “slicing off some other speculation” resulting from “corruption.”

Unsurprisingly, the Alzheimer’s Affiliation has known as this “demonstrably false.”

“In actuality, over the latest 10 years obtainable (2014-2023), less than 14% of latest Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH) Alzheimer’s initiatives targeted on amyloid beta because the therapeutic goal,” the group wrote, “As of September 2024, the National Institute on Aging was investing in 495 pharmacological and non-pharmacological trials. To state that Alzheimer’s analysis is concentrated on amyloid to the exclusion of different targets is clearly fallacious.”

If I, personally, needed extra sturdy medical analysis and an opportunity an everlasting life (I do not), greasing the wheels of an administration broadly gutting funding for science can be a wierd technique to make that occur. However that is the type of incoherence we have come to count on from tech oligarchs: they are saying what advantages them, even when it is nonsense on its face, even when a second’s reflection reveals it to be patently false. What’s embarrassing is the paper of report giving them free reign to do it.